Then along comes NVMe several months later that killed all of that.įYI Aeolisio hasnt been active here for over a year. When the G751 JTs and JYs introduced the M2 SSD the SM951 AHCI OEM drives were the fastest and first drives to supersede SATA. Brass tax is the G751JY came out at a bad time in the drive evolution. One member here did this very thing and got worse results from a 950pro NVME than he did with an SM951 AHCI M2. You posted this same thing over a year ago and no benchmarks on the drive.
PM951 DISKMARK MOD
This has been done before and what you get after you mod your bios is pitiful speeds making it not worth the effort.
PM951 DISKMARK DRIVER
Hi, did you ever figure out the driver situation for your SM951?īoot yes, fully supported, not even close. One last thing, how did you stress your 951 to get it to show 8.0gb/s on the hwinfo 64 screen shot? thanks. for the 8 series chipset ahci controller, and the 0.16384 driver for standard sata ahci controller. so i wouldn't think any throttling has played a part.
I am running win 10 btw, jfyi, and my sm951 rarely ever goes above 50c, even under heavy loads.
PM951 DISKMARK DRIVERS
can you confirm for me, exactly which chipset drivers, and irst drivers you are putting on all of these g751jy's with the sm951? thanks for all of your help. so i am not assured that i am running the very best drivers where that is concerned. the intel auto detector doesn't work when i've completed the steps for that, and it can be extremely confusing which variants to load. but here's the thing about the chipset drivers, and the rst. so i have run through the optimization for each of my drives. i did clean installs and newest drivers with all 9 g751s i did the sm951 with and all are heatsinked to avoid thermal throttling. Not knowing exactly what you did i cant really say. run through your drivers chipset and other intel drivers like rst.
PM951 DISKMARK INSTALL
no idea why your not running at 8 as i didnt install yours. any help is very much appreciated.įor trim you need to optimize it once in windows under drive properties/tools. so i guess the logical question is how do i get the drive setup as you have setup yours? next, when i look in hwinfo 64, mine does say gen 3, but it doesn't change from the 5 gb/s current link speed, no matter what i put the drive through, even though it states a max of 8.0 gb/s. i'm not sure why, but it does not return a result which concludes that trim is running on this drive. Next, according to that program, my drive is NOT running trim. wish it would alert me when there are new responses. i actually forgot about this thread, and haven't found it again until now.
Ok, first thank you for responding with good information. unless your drive is packed and your not running optimize for trim you should be getting much faster your probably throttling yourself. You can read more about the thermal issues here. On crystal im getting 19 for seq on ATTO im getting 20 after heatsink install. This is a very good storage benchmarking software and we hope you will use it.For temp monitoring i use HWmonitor and an external probe thermo and a fluke infared thermo when its opened. For sequential testing, we will be running two types of tests: the 1MiB Q8T1 and the 128KiB Q32T1, so we hope you can use the higher performance as its peak performance. In addition, the benchmark conditions have also been revamped to reflect the latest PCIe 4.0-compatible SSDs’ performance. Over the past year since the release of CrystalDiskMark 7, we have refined Project Priscilla, the common UI library for CrystalDiskMark and CrystalDiskInfo, and have expanded the basic functions, such as transparency support for edit boxes and combo boxes, 16-bit color support, Per-Monitor DPIv2 support, and Windows 10 dark mode support using a private API. In CrystalDiskMark 7, we were unable to implement the edit box transparency feature inevitably, and we had to provide a dedicated window & edit box to enter comments, which was very disappointing.
0 kommentar(er)
